Welcome to Emulationworld

Forum Index | FAQ | New User | Login | Search

*View All ThreadsShow in Flat Mode*


Subjecttrally question Reply to this message
Posted byMrPib
Posted on04/30/04 09:58 PM



Hi. I first want to thank Roman for ClrMame. It's a fantastic proggie. Now onto my question. I have Mame32 .81u9 and ClrMame 3.31 installed, and I had ClrMame create the .dat file from Mame32. ClrMame showed that I had all u9 roms (and chds), but a Mame32 audit showed that Thrash Rally was missing two roms (038-c3.bin and 038-c4.bin). [Mame also complains about are51, but I understand that that's being corrected in Mame]. I downloaded a fresh trally.zip, which has those two roms. Mame32 now OKs trally, but ClrMame flags them as unneeded. My question is, how can Mame32 and ClrMame have different ideas about trally, when ClrMame's data file is *from* Mame?

Thanks,
Pib




-
Entire Thread
Subject  Posted byPosted On
.trally question  MrPib04/30/04 09:58 PM
.*Re: trally question  Roman05/03/04 03:44 AM