> > but what if i would need a detailed list of files i have?
>
> Well....the good old "have" discussion ;)

sorry, i didn't know you have talked yet about it... i'm a newbie of this forum... :)

> I still think it's not needed neither
> real implementable. ClrMamePro did always show the issues with sets, not that a
> set is ok or complete since ok/complete are relative terms which highly depend
> on the used settings. Like if you only scanned for missing files, you may get no
> errors...but that doesn't mean you're complete or the sets are ok (there can be
> wrong names for example). It's like you can't say your system is virusfree...you
> can only proof the existance of a virus on your system. That's why scanners say
> 0 virus found and not 'you're virusfree' ;) I doubt I will add some kind of
> detailed have list....so you need something which gives you the boolean NOT of a
> miss list ;) Currently I don't know how you can do that quickly...
>

i see your point... prob you're right. actually when i needed such a list, i solved my problems doing a couple of rebuild (i didn't remember where i had a particular file with given crc & sha-1)... i thought to a similar feature mainly for a sort of analogy: you have have/miss output, but there exist just miss details... now i understand that there's a good reason for that :)

thx for reply and good work