Welcome to Emulationworld

Forum Index | FAQ | New User | Login | Search

*View All ThreadsShow in Flat Mode*


SubjectRe: Cowering Goodtrools vs clrmame dats Reply to this message
Posted bymameniac
Posted on11/05/04 01:58 PM



> > ClrmamePro uses the crc32 values directly from the good*.exe. The only
> > difference is that goodtools skip headers before they calculate the checksum,
> > while cmpro calculate the hashes on the full file. The given checksums are
> > always for the pure romdata without any header information. So you have to
> > remove possible header if you want to get correct crc32 values.
>
> I see thanks for clearing that up. Do you know if there are any universal tools
> out there for removing header info from all, or many, of the different GoodTools
> rom formats?
>

ucon64.sf.net, (ab)use it

it's command line only tho



-
Entire Thread
Subject  Posted byPosted On
*Cowering Goodtrools vs clrmame dats  Locut0s10/30/04 06:48 PM
.*Re: Cowering Goodtrools vs clrmame dats  Roman10/31/04 11:37 AM
..*Re: Cowering Goodtrools vs clrmame dats  Locut0s11/04/04 06:41 PM
....Re: Cowering Goodtrools vs clrmame dats  mameniac11/05/04 01:58 PM