> Just wondering, whether this behaviour is expected: according to MAME/MAWS ddrja
> seems to consist of only the nodump (gc845ja.u1) and CHD 845jab02.chd. With
> "hide missing" checked , the set is still marked as missing. My guess is, that
> this is because there exists no zip archive ddrja.zip for this set in this case,
> correct?
> I seem to remember that this had happened once before for another set and you
> had answered this already then. But I could not find the thread now, so I maybe
> wrong.
>


The set ddrja consists of a nodump rom and a chd. If you don't have either of it (and got 'sets' + 'missing' enabled), the 'set' ddrja is listed as missing because no part of the set was found. Not the roms, not the chds. It has nothing to do with the rom being a nodump.

I still wonder why people always connect the term 'set' with roms ;) A set can be a collection of chds only for example. Or a chd + sample files or ... or ... or...


Roman Scherzer