> This statement seems incorrect to me? My point was that when fastscanning a set
> with ZERO roms listed with issues from the previous scan, and I alter a rom
> (break its name), the fastscan detects that and fixes it. So the scanner is
> looking at roms that were NOT listed as having issues.
>


If check set + name / unneeded was enabled, this check is of course done in the fastscan as well and it detects your change.


Roman Scherzer