At the moment I am rebuilding my sets but am finding myself having to open each one up again after being batch processed to save the miss / have lists...

So I was just wondering if there was any way of automatically saving the miss / have lists for DATs scanned through batch?

Thanks in advance

possible of course (as a future gimmick). However I personally don't like the have/miss lists since they aren't accurate at all (it's a simple quick check) and I'd like to get them removed completely.....


Roman Scherzer

Thanks for the reply Roman... So would you suggest the use of logs is preferred over miss / have lists?

That's what I've started using now since I can do that automatically when I batch scan...

A scan (and so the logs) are much more accurate then any have/miss list.


Roman Scherzer