Welcome to Emulationworld

Forum Index | FAQ | New User | Login | Search

*View All ThreadsShow in Flat Mode*


SubjectRe: Possible new bug *edit* Reply to this message
Posted byRoman
Posted on02/27/09 07:47 AM



> I have to disable sets, otherwise CHD-only games (like haremchl) are shown as
> missing.

You know that you can fool cmpro's setcheck here by simply adding empty rompath subfolders for the chd-only sets in question. :O) You shouldn't disable 'sets'. So you can bypass the missing set warning...however you will still get of course missing chds....

*edit*

Don't turn off sets!!!! There is no reason to turn this off at all!!! Since you're interested in e.g. correctly named setnames (e.g. pacman.zip), aren't you. "Sets" checks the archive itself while "roms" checks the files in the archive.



Roman Scherzer


-
Entire Thread
Subject  Posted byPosted On
*Possible new bug  f205v02/26/09 04:32 PM
.*Re: Possible new bug  Roman02/26/09 04:43 PM
..*Re: Possible new bug  Roman02/26/09 04:56 PM
...*Re: Possible new bug  f205v02/27/09 03:01 AM
....*Re: Possible new bug  Roman02/27/09 03:18 AM
.....*Re: Possible new bug  f205v02/27/09 06:41 AM
.......Re: Possible new bug *edit*  Roman02/27/09 07:47 AM
.......*Re: Possible new bug *edit*  f205v02/27/09 01:03 PM
........*Re: Possible new bug *edit*  Roman03/01/09 08:49 AM
.........*Re: Possible new bug *edit*  f205v03/02/09 04:11 AM
..........*Re: Possible new bug *edit*  Roman03/02/09 05:59 AM