Welcome to Emulationworld

Forum Index | FAQ | New User | Login | Search

Make a New PostPrevious ThreadView All ThreadsNext ThreadShow in Flat Mode*


Subjectthere are terms and conditions in the license Reply to this message
Posted byJoffeman
Posted on12/01/04 04:25 AM



it's modified gpl, the source can be distributed for such builds, but not the binaries, iirc. no court cases have established this as 'word of law' but in the open-source community such things seem to be taken as such, because they want to respect the authors' wishes. i think it's better those builds are not distributed in binary form, to keep The Man from putting their collective nose where it isn't welcome, but i can't say i personally haven't benefitted from 'illegal' builds that i didn't compile myself. i don't really respect the programmers of the games themselves because they get paid decently for what they do. i respect the mame team because they do what they do for free [aside from the benefits of the boards and stuff they get], and they don't charge for it either.

rambling early-morning post..

don't think it was right to ban lux though.

j

-
Entire Thread
Subject  Posted byPosted On
*lux_92886 asked to be unbanned  Terry Bogard11/30/04 08:36 PM
.*Could retrogames please unban me from the message board -nt-  skydoune11/30/04 09:22 PM
..*justify or delete -nt-  ChachiSqrPants11/30/04 10:24 PM
.*I haven't been promoted yet. NT Tib or postamessege could help him.  Death Knight11/30/04 08:56 PM
.*why was he banned -nt-   Ti-BOne11/30/04 08:51 PM
..*He posted an "illegal" mame build, by name only in NG...  Evildrak11/30/04 09:07 PM
...*Re: He posted an "illegal" mame build, by name only in NG...  VmprHntrD11/30/04 10:54 PM
.....there are terms and conditions in the license  Joffeman12/01/04 04:25 AM
.....*Re: there are terms and conditions in the license  VmprHntrD12/01/04 03:43 PM