> I think we may be arguing semantics. I think Walmart should be making the
> decision to put the sticker on, IF they know the content. They also should be
> investigating what they're putting on the shelves, if the music company is
> trying to put one past them.

Ok, agreed

> Now, I think your argument is they should be the ones to decide if the warning
> sticker goes on it.

No, I was arguing against that (which is where I think we got confused). I think it should go on it because the content is there.

I was just trying to say, that if Wal Mart aren't the ones responsible for putting the thing on the CD, why aren't they suing the people responsible for that also? AFAIK the "Parental Advisory" warning was actually printed onto the CD jackets themselves and not some sticker.

> But, none of this absolves Walmart from misleading parents. If I put out a porno
> that doesn't have a label for offensive content, should Walmart go and sell it
> to kids? Of course not. They have to be smarter.

Yeah agreed