> i blame fanboys then.. the only reviewers that i read for new films are ebert &
> the guys at ruthless.. i read slasherpool & ispitonyourmovie for 'specialized'
> genre reviews.
>
> ebert gave it a reasonably favourable review, but he generally does for action
> films, if they 'serve their purpose' (entertaining explosions).. that doesn't
> mean it is a quality film by a traditionalist's standards, of course.
>
> i saw the first one back in the day, someone had the dvd and i was wasted.
> wasn't too bad, not my cup of tea, though.
>
>