|
> If new products weren't forced on people no body would buy them. We would be > riding in steam powered cars because gas is expensive and everyone would tune in > to the radio station and imagine a good night. Every OS that comes out is always > shit on for the first year or so. XP was the exact same way when 98 was still > around. just give it time and vista will become what XP is today. not saying its > wrong to bitch though. i tried vista and i loved it, i like the littles things > they improved. rewrote the games, including some kiddy games for the younger > folk. allowed microsoft supported widgets on the desktop (take xp and throw > window blinds on it and see what happens for sys performance) the only thing > that really bugs me is the whole lock down of the hard drive and issues with > dual booting. gaming and software incompatibility is to be expected in my book > > > Am I the only one who thinks it's kind of a scam? I've been shopping for a > > laptop for someone else, and pretty much everything has Vista on it. I can't > > see anything good about it. Let's look at the proposed benefits: > > > > More reliable. I don't really buy it; XP/2000 is pretty relibale on it's own, > > and I havn't seen anything that suggests that Vista is invincible, other than > > Microsoft saying it is. > > > > More security. Didn't Kaspersky and other AV companies come out and say that > > it's worse than XP SP2 in terms of security? > > > > Pretty new GUI. Which uses a lot of resources. Personally I don't care much > > for the graphical gloss. > > > > Direct3D 10. This just pisses me off. Way to screw over gamers. I hope > > someone figures out a workaround or devs start using OpenGL instead. > > > > And the bad... > > > > Mass consumption of resources. Not only does this hurt you in hardware costs, > > but especially for laptops, the power consumption just kills battery life. > From > > what I hear, a lot of people are switching to XP because of this and the next > > problem... > > > > Compatibility. I've been hearing about tons of compatibility issues with old > > stuff. Games especially. > > > > So I guess I don't get it. I've never liked Microsoft's tactics, but this > seems > > like a scam. It makes me feel like going back to 98, just on principal. I > hear > > FAT32 blows for larger hard drives though; and XP has better built in hardware > > support. It's really too bad that Linux sucks so much for games (other than > > emulators), otherwise I'd be all over some Ubuntu. > > > > > Yes its a sig... yes i am worthless >
|