I never noticed this until all of this media attention, but none of Michael Jackson's children appear to have his genes; they all look purely white so I'm assuming that they were adopted or he had women impregnated with donor sperm.

According to Fox, he is NOT the biological father of any of the children.

Maybe he didn't make any babies?



The new and improved King of Lamers 2003!

> According to Fox, he is NOT the biological father of any of the children.
>
> Maybe he didn't make any babies?
>
Nope he never fathered kids for whatever reason. Let's say for a second he had some health issues, including whatever partly whitened his skin (aside from all the bleaching) and how he felt he was facially ugly. Perhaps some mental block made him feel the need to get with that Debbie Rowe and have a surrogate knock her up or whatever the process for the kids. Fact is, they're his, just not biologically.

Fact is, they're his, just not
> biologically.
>
>
Um doesn't that give the biological parents leverage? I've never thought non biological parents had many rights, not that I think much of a biological mother who sells her kids...



The new and improved King of Lamers 2003!

I equate what I think he did (have other people make the baby(ies)) with adoption so I would consider him the legal guardian if he did indeed care for those children from the time they were born.

Anyway, I think it's kinda funny that they're all white, hence the reason I made the topic.

I suspect he did what he did so he can fondle them and it won't be incest and they can't accuse him of molestation. Jackson had a real problem.

> I equate what I think he did (have other people make the baby(ies)) with
> adoption so I would consider him the legal guardian if he did indeed care for
> those children from the time they were born.
>
> Anyway, I think it's kinda funny that they're all white, hence the reason I made
> the topic.
>
>

> Fact is, they're his, just not
> > biologically.
> >
> >
> Um doesn't that give the biological parents leverage? I've never thought non
> biological parents had many rights, not that I think much of a biological mother
> who sells her kids...
>

No see he did much like he did with his ex-wife Rowe in a sense. Had the original father end of the equation just write off his rights entirely basically making him nothing more than a walking cum bucket with zero recourse ever. Doing what he did would be even tighter than a normal adoption where someone could come back into the picture later and try crap depending on regional/state laws.