Welp I'm siding with them too. If I'm going to pay for you to get benefits out of my tax dollars, then there should be limitations on what you're allowed to do as far as foods go that could potentially make the condition worse. If you start eating shit that makes your problems worse, then you'll suck even more money off the gov'ts teet which means more taxes out of my paycheck I work for. I get what' they're saying, and as much as regulation sucks, if you're going to sponge off my paycheck it shouldn't be a blank check to be destructive in a way that more would be needed later. As far as limits go, the only limit if this regulation did happen, again should be against behaviors by the person that would be considered destructive to their welfare which would increase the costs of support. Screwing someone just because they got accidentally hurt or got old shouldn't happen. I get what they're saying and it's basically like if you have a fat ass, high cholestrol, and you're on your second heart attack -- and the gov't is paying your health care needs you should be banned from stuffing shit down your throat that'll lead to heart attack #3 such as going to McDonalds a few times a week. Seems fair when you look at it like that.