> Which is pretty much a Q.E.D. for what dayvee said about little domains on the
> net.

Sure. Never said the contrary. Already forgot the time when I said the only rule here is "Don't annoy me"? It's still true.


> Prophet's point is perfectly valid: whilst there was a relatively high noise to
> bandwidth ratio, there was also some perfectly good discussion that didn't
> deserve to be cut off - if there wasn't, there wouldn't have been a need for a
> new thread.

There was a new thread because for some reason dayvee thought he was owned an answer on some points. Newsflash, he's not.


> If you're not prepared to take the time to sort the wheat from the
> chaff, then you shouldn't just be locking any which thread you think might
> contain something objectionable; and if - by your own admission - you don't have
> the free time, then perhaps you shouldn't be doing it period.

You know, rg gen is in a rather good shape now because I act like a bastard[1] on it. I really don't want it to go back to the shape it was in before I took care of the moderation, so I'll keep on being a bastard until sometimes worthy - Prophet for instance - takes over.

OG.

[1] And maybe am, but that's another subject entirely