|
> I remember some people saying that Dosbox's authors didn't want to show it > really did support running Windows 3.1 (one of its specific versions though, not > all of them). So they made the announcement last April 1st, and then some people > on these board were going "hey, it's real" and others "shhhh! they don't want MS > to find out! You blew it!!". > > > > > [download a life] >
My bad. I knew nothing about the DosBox release. I just ASSumed that, since it was April 1st, everyone was being sarcastic. :)
Jason
|