> > Yeah, but what a case of the pot calling the kettle black when Mame starts
> > argueing about trademark infringement.
>
> AFAIK MAME does not infringe on any trademarks. Its like saying Sony is
> infringing trademarks if I use one of there DVD players to play bootlegged
> movies.


Bad example. What legitimate function does Mame provide without the use of illegal roms?