> > (Lindbergh and System SP are not the same)
> I've heard exactly the opposite, until something gets officially announced or I
> get information to the contrary (from a reliable source) I wont be beleiving
> > > Aurora: new lowend board to replace NAOMI, Atomiswave and all other budget
> > boards (as you said). but is not as powerful as NAOMI 2.
> Erm, thats exactly what I said, and I quote;
> "the Lindbergh, their high end Naomi2/Chihiro’s replacement, the Aurora, the low
> end Naomi/Atomiswave’s replacement"
I know you said that. but you also said that Aurora is 4 times more powerful than NAOMI and Atomiswave which is not true. Aurora is about 1.5 times as powerful (or 50% more) than NAOMI and Atomiswave.
the older NAOMI2 is about 3 to 4 times as powerful as NAOMI and Atomiswave :) thanks to its parallal processing which the new Aurora board will not have (single GPU)