Forum Index | FAQ | New User | Login | Search

Make a New PostPrevious ThreadView All ThreadsNext ThreadShow in Flat Mode*

SubjectRe: Question? Reply to this message
Posted byslipstream
Posted on07/28/05 03:24 PM

> > (Lindbergh and System SP are not the same)
> I've heard exactly the opposite, until something gets officially announced or I
> get information to the contrary (from a reliable source) I wont be beleiving
> it...
> > > Aurora: new lowend board to replace NAOMI, Atomiswave and all other budget
> > boards (as you said). but is not as powerful as NAOMI 2.
> Erm, thats exactly what I said, and I quote;
> "the Lindbergh, their high end Naomi2/Chihiro’s replacement, the Aurora, the low
> end Naomi/Atomiswave’s replacement"
> Six...
I know you said that. but you also said that Aurora is 4 times more powerful than NAOMI and Atomiswave which is not true. Aurora is about 1.5 times as powerful (or 50% more) than NAOMI and Atomiswave.

the older NAOMI2 is about 3 to 4 times as powerful as NAOMI and Atomiswave :) thanks to its parallal processing which the new Aurora board will not have (single GPU)

Entire Thread
Subject  Posted byPosted On
*System 16 Updated  Sixtoe07/26/05 02:07 PM
.*Question?  Techrat 200407/26/05 10:54 PM
..*Re: Question?  Sixtoe07/26/05 11:33 PM
...*Re: Question?  slipstream07/27/05 07:00 PM
....*Re: Question?  Lando24207/28/05 08:56 AM
.....*Re: Question?  slipstream07/28/05 03:23 PM
....*Re: Question?  Sixtoe07/28/05 03:06 AM
......Re: Question?  slipstream07/28/05 03:24 PM
.*Re: System 16 Updated  elgondolero07/26/05 07:47 PM