Welcome to Emulationworld

Forum Index | FAQ | New User | Login | Search

Make a New PostPrevious ThreadView All ThreadsNext ThreadShow in Flat Mode*


SubjectRe: FBA 0.2.96.58 Reply to this message
Posted byTechrat 2004
Posted on01/20/07 11:54 PM



What I was saying was it appears MAME no longer sets the standards to what timeframe is considered in emulating a game.

Previously it seemed that MAMEs standards applied to most other emulators, now we have Razoola releasing an XOR for a game that is 'too new' for MAME and two emulators eating it up.

Not emu-drama, but kind of giving MAME DEV the finger.

> > I see MAME DEV are getting the finger again with another emulator supporting a
> > 'too new' video game. I'm suprised Razoola didn't get flack for making the
> XORs
> > for the game and releasing them, or Kawaks or Final Burn for supporting them
> > before MAME.
> >
> > I'll be curious is MAME will support it in Febuary or not...
> >
> > MAME used to be the standard emulators followed, I guess that's no longer
> true?
> >
>
> There is no Emu-Drama.
>




-
Entire Thread
Subject  Posted byPosted On
*FBA 0.2.96.58  Trebor01/19/07 06:52 AM
.*Why not on the official site?  Terry Bogard01/20/07 08:10 AM
..*See Original Post...  Trebor01/20/07 06:56 PM
.*Re: FBA 0.2.96.58  Techrat 200401/19/07 09:24 PM
..*Re: FBA 0.2.96.58  Tourniquet01/20/07 05:11 AM
....Re: FBA 0.2.96.58  Techrat 200401/20/07 11:54 PM