Welcome to Emulationworld

Forum Index | FAQ | New User | Login | Search

Make a New PostPrevious ThreadView All ThreadsNext ThreadShow in Flat Mode*


SubjectRe: Thanks for the replies - which to choose? Reply to this message
Posted byAnonymous (24.2.179.244)
Posted on03/07/01 08:47 PM



I don't really like the onscreen controls, so that being my preference, along with using my existing CF card without the need of a condom, I went with the E-125. The fact that I will be using it with my outlook calendar, tasks, etc. didn't really factor in much, since they are about the same in that catagory. Should be here tomorrow.

Yes the EM-50 project was the secret project RV turned tank that Bill Murry took out to get washed... "Thats the Fact Jack"

Oldie

> While the iPAQ has the speed, MameCE3, Mameboy is more fun on the EM500 and
> E125, even though the games are slower. It boils down to the gameplay and
> controls. The iPAQ not only has the issue with multiple button presses not
> being recognized but it also causes diagonals to not be acknowledged either.
> Also the joypad and button arrangement leaves alot to be desired when compared
> to the Casio line.
>
> The latest emulators are getting better with the iPAQ shortcomings like
> PocketEngine and PocketFC which plays games in landscape mode with virtual
> buttons on screen. An overclocked iPAQ can play PC Engine games with sound with
> practically no slow down. Domenico did a great job with that emulator. Also,
> Techmaster will address on-screen buttons in a later release so there is still
> hope for iPAQ owners to benefit from this feature.
>
> Just like Marco said before speed or gameplay, which is most important to you
> and which one are you willing to sacrifice.
>
> EM-50? Wasn't that the RV with built-in gun turrents and rocket launchers?
>
> Ottoman
>
>
>
> > > I have a spare 128mb CF card that i was intending to use for this, but it
> > seems
> > > the EM-500 and iPAQ don't take them?
> >
> > iPAQ can take that card if you purchase CFII sleeve for it. IMHO that sleeve
> > makes iPAQ both ugly and too big, but that card is not something you should
> > waste. EM-500 can't take it no matter what you do. MMC cards are much smaller
> > than CF (and completely different architechture).
> >
> >
> > > Oh and every time I see EM-500 it makes me
> > > think of the EM-50 project (remember the movie Stripes?)
> >
> > No? What was the EM-50 project?? Please give some web links or something!
> >
>




-
Entire Thread
Subject  Posted byPosted On
*Palm version? (Prism actually...)  Anonymous03/06/01 07:29 PM
.*Re: Palm version? (Prism actually...)  Tekhmaster03/06/01 09:49 PM
..*Re: Palm version? (Prism actually...)  Marconelly!03/07/01 09:22 AM
...*Thanks for the replies - which to choose?  Anonymous03/07/01 10:35 AM
....*Re: Thanks for the replies - which to choose?  Marconelly!03/07/01 11:37 AM
.....*Re: Thanks for the replies - which to choose?  Anonymous03/07/01 03:40 PM
......*Re: Thanks for the replies - which to choose?  Anonymous03/08/01 11:08 PM
.......*Re: Thanks for the replies - which to choose?  Marconelly!03/10/01 03:24 AM
.......Re: Thanks for the replies - which to choose?  Anonymous03/07/01 08:47 PM
.......*Don't forget PocketQuake  Mark Rejhon03/10/01 03:10 PM
........*Is this the same Mark R...  Anonymous03/11/01 00:14 AM
.........*Re: Is this the same Mark R...  Marconelly!03/11/01 04:06 AM
........*Re: Don't forget PocketQuake  Marconelly!03/10/01 05:22 PM
.........*Re: Don't forget PocketQuake  Tekhmaster03/10/01 11:28 PM