> He gets banned because he is arguing all the time with other users.

I'm glad that you know the reason I was banned. At least someone does (rolls eyes).

> Nearly every day you could go to the forums and see another chapter in the
> "Pacdude-saga".

Right. A person contributes to threads in the debate area and that's supposed to be bad? I never saw a rule against arguing in VPForums. They even had a debate area for "arguing" even until they started seeing other people "argue" with them about their inability to follow their own posted rules. Hell, I've started exactly 2 threads on MODS or rules thereof and 1 thread on Open Source. That's hardly a pattern. Any other discussion has been a result of either replying to someone else's outlandish comments or some jealous individual crashing in on one of my release or WIP threads with some nonsense designed to try and provoke me. I may post long diatribes, but there's no rule against that. If I'm not flaming anyone, they have no ground to stand on. The fact I never even got a warning only proves they had no basis on which to ban me.

> I want to read about VP and VPF tables and developments NOT the latest Pacdude
> "soap opera".

Well, that's what my Dr. Who WIP thread was all about until KC came barging in on it causing trouble. People try and point at me as the troublemaker, but I'm not the one that barged in with false accusations about using ramps and other BS.

> If he'd learn to shut-up he would solve most of his forum troubles.

I don't see you shutting up here. You seem to be trying to cause your own trouble with personal flames in another post down below. It's the oldest trick in the book. Do something and then point the finger at someone else.